U.S.+v.+Playboy+(C8)

U.S. v. Playboy (Mr. Correll period 8) Jenna Haniotakis & Erica Mogan **VS.**

United States VS. Playboy Facts about United States VS. Playboy, are in 1996, congress enacted the communications dencency act. The purpose of a second 505 was to protect nonsubscribers and their children from “signal blend”. One major question we had was section 505 of the communications decency act of 1996 the least restrictive means to block the transmission of cable television channel primarily dedicated to sexually oriented programming such that it doesn’t violate the 1st amendment. One major law or rights discussed is communications decency act of 1996.My reasoning to this is the federal government failed to show that section 505 was the least restrictive means to requiring cable TV operator to fully scramble or limit time when sexually oriented programming was transmitted violated the first amendment free speech guarantee.

__In 1996, congresss enacted the Communications Decency Act__